Peer, Parent and Caregiver Interventions for Adolescents at Risk for Depression

There is sufficient evidence that peer-led interventions have a positive impact on social outcomes for adolescents at risk for depression, with impacts extending to the family and/or caregiving context.

Assessment Post Image

Study Characteristics and Contextual Tags

chevron
Impact Assessment

Impact Assessment

The findings below synthesize the results of the studies on peer-led interventions in adolescents at risk for depression across three domains of measurement:

  • Healthcare Cost, Utilization & Value: More evidence is needed for the impact of peer-led interventions on adolescents at risk for depression. These outcomes were not assessed in identified studies.
  • Health: More evidence is needed to show that peer-led interventions for adolescents at risk for depression are related to consistent improvements in health outcomes. Some observational studies show some positive effects, such as family and peer relationships protecting against adolescent depression through improvements in self-esteem and self-reported mental well-being. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show no significant differences in subjective illness burden and no effect on clinical symptoms. Additionally, systematic reviews suggest minimal to no significant impact on mental health outcomes. While there are indications of potential benefits, more robust, high-quality research is needed to establish reliable outcomes.
  • Social: There is sufficient evidence from RCTs, non-randomized trials, and systematic reviews that peer-led interventions are associated with positive social outcomes, such as improved social connectedness, reduced internalized stigma, and improved coping skills, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Improvements in family-centered skills, such as parenting skills, caregiver engagement, and problem-solving, were also observed. However, some outcomes, such as parental stress, attitudes toward mental health services, and stigma, showed no significant differences.
Background of the Need / Need Impact on Health

Symptoms of depression often include feelings of sadness, inability to feel happiness, self-criticism, fatigue, loss of appetite and inability to sleep[1]. Symptoms can fall on a spectrum from mild to severe. Major depression signifies an impairment that interferes with an individual’s ability to conduct activities in daily life[2].

There has been an increase in adolescent stress, anxiety, depression, self-harm, and suicidality. Adolescent depression increased from 8.1% in 2009 to 15.8% in 2019 with higher rates of depression among people who identify as female than male[3]. Suicide is the third leading cause of death among adolescents with depression being a leading risk factor[4]. About five million adolescents experienced a major depressive episode in 2021, with the prevalence being higher among females, 29.2% of whom experienced an episode compared to 11.5% of males[5]. The group that demonstrated the highest prevalence of experiencing a major depressive episode were adolescents who identify as two or more races (27.2%).

A growing body of evidence suggests that positive parenting practices, such as parental warmth and granting adolescents autonomy coupled with age-appropriate levels of activity monitoring, are associated with lower rates of adolescent depression. Conversely, psychological control, punishment-focus, inappropriate levels of activity restriction/monitoring for developmental age, and inter-parental conflict within the household are negative risk factors[6].

Depression can lead to substance misuse, eating disorders, obesity, challenges with social functioning, and adult depression[7],[8]. Among adolescents in particular, depression is often underdiagnosed and remains untreated, as symptoms can be attributed to the mood swings and affectation typically associated with adolescence[9]. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that all adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 be screened for depression[10].

Treatment for depression spans a myriad of interventions including evidence-based talk therapy, medication, and sleep and exercise[11].  Among U.S. adolescents who experienced a major depressive episode in 2021, only 40.6% received treatment[12]. Lower rates of treatment and medication use were found among racial/ethnic minorities and adolescents without any medical insurance[13].

Adolescents of color are more likely to be underdiagnosed, treated less frequently, and, when services are rendered, are less likely to have a clinically meaningful impact compared to their White counterparts. Between 2005 and 2012, data collected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey indicated that Hispanic and Black people were significantly more likely to experience serious depression than White people[14]. In a 2011 RAND report entitled, The Teen Depression Awareness Project, the majority of White teens from a diverse sample reported readiness to receive therapy for depression, while Black and Hispanic teens reported treatment readiness at lower rates[15]. Provider-mediated factors contributing to differences in treatment readiness include practice location and accessibility, referral bias, and culturally uninformed provider communication[16].

Background on the Intervention

According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), treatment for depression is most effective if it is tailored to the needs of the child and family[17]. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) emphasizes that treatment for depression should be ‘person-centered’ meaning that it is responsive to the individual’s cultural, linguistic, and other social and environmental needs. ‘Family-centered’ care recognizes the important role of family members and caregivers in the design and implementation of individualized, person-centered services[18]. The National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) provides peer-led training for Family Support Groups for any adult with a loved one who has experienced symptoms of a mental health condition. One advantage of the Family Support Group is that participating family members gain insight from the challenges and successes of others who have been through similar experiences[19]. Peer-to-peer mental health interventions focus on prevention and the development of social-emotional skills. Peer-to-peer intervention models can be helpful for youth who may be resistant to traditional treatment methods. Peer-to-peer programs have historically been implemented within schools as an important component of their mental health strategy[20]. Potential models include peer-designed/led groups, wellness ambassador programs, peer health educator models, and counseling programs.

Peer interventions may provide prevention and help youth overcome some barriers to seeking care. In the 2011 RAND report on teen depression, themes that emerged from focus groups and surveys included the following[21]:

  • Compared to teens without evidence of depression, even after adjustment for race, gender, and income, depressed teens reported that they felt less supported by peers and parents
  • Greater knowledge of depression therapies, especially among parents, influenced teens’ likelihood of receiving care
  • At their initial interview,  teens who experience depression perceived more barriers than their parents
  • The most prevalent barriers for teens with depression were (1) worries about family perceptions, (2) other responsibilities, and (3) trouble making an appointment
  • The most prevalent barriers for their parents were (1) trouble making an appointment, (2) cost was too high, and (3) parents not wanting care

Medicaid provides coverage for 27 million children 18 years of age and younger[22]. Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) together cover more than 41 million U.S. children[23]. These programs, in addition to other federal funding streams, can support behavioral health services for adolescents. Schools can combine insurance coverage and funding from federal, state, and local sources as well as grants and collaborate with mental health clinics to support school-based mental health programs[24]. Some states use mechanisms such as Medicaid 1915(b)(3) waivers to provide funding for peer services that are not Medicaid benefits. There are often significant limitations to these services, for example they may only be available to youth with severe and persistent mental illness rather than being available for preventive purposes[25].

Evidence Review
Note: The vocabulary used in the table is the same terminology used in the study in order to preserve the integrity of the summary. 
Study
Population
Intervention Summary
Type of Study Design
Outcomes

Caregivers of children with mental health concerns.

NAMI's peer-led family support program for caregivers of children with mental health concerns. Caregivers participated in a six-class NAMI course led by peer parents.

Randomized control trial. 111 families were randomly assigned to the NAMI course (n=52) or an eight-week waitlist (n=59).

Social: Compared with caregivers on the waitlist, program participants reported significant increases in parent engagement, activation, and intentions to engage with mental health services (p<0.001). NAMI participants also reported significant decreases in their child’s intrapersonal (p=0.02) and interpersonal distress (p=0.003). No differences were observed on measures of parental stress, attitudes toward mental health services, or stigma.

Parents in the United Kingdom (UK), specifically those living in areas of greater social deprivation and experiencing significant social disadvantage.

Empowering Parents Empowering Communities’ (EPEC) Being a Parent (BAP) program, a peer-led, community-based parenting program. EPEC is a task sharing, peer-led parenting approach. Its group-based parenting course format is consistent with policy recommendations and intended to build social support between participants, optimize impact, and lower unit cost. EPEC is delivered in local, community locations and the program uses high visibility, pro-active local outreach campaigns to engage parents.

Quasi-experimental study with an embedded randomized control trial used for benchmarking purposes (n=930).

Social: Parent participants reported significant improvements in child concerns, parenting skills, parenting goals, and overall parental wellbeing.

Systematic Reviews
Note: The vocabulary used in the table is the same terminology used in the study in order to preserve the integrity of the summary. 
Study
Population
Intervention Summary
Type of Study Design
Outcomes
Acri et al. (2017)

Families of children and adults with mental health conditions.

Peer-facilitated services focused on coping and parenting skills, mental health knowledge, and emotional support.

Systematic review of 6 randomized studies.

Social: Significant improvements in family-centered skills such as overall functioning, parenting skills related to the intervention, knowledge about mental illness, parental concerns about their child, and general parenting skills.

Sun et al. (2022)

Individuals with mental health conditions, including adolescents, college students, people who are unemployed, as well as family members of adults experiencing mental health challenges.

Peer-led interventions targeting self-stigma, clinical symptoms, recovery-related outcomes, and disclosure-related outcomes in individuals with mental health conditions.

Systematic review. Meta-analysis of 8 RCTs evaluating peer-led interventions targeting self-stigma, clinical symptoms, recovery-related outcomes, and disclosure-related outcomes in individuals with mental health conditions.

Health: There was no significant influence on clinical symptoms such as depression, anxiety and hopelessness.

Social: The peer-led intervention had a positive effect on reducing self-stigma and stigma pressure. The intervention also showed a positive effect on rehabilitation and empowerment, though without statistical significance. It also significantly improved self-efficacy and the willingness to seek professional help. Additionally, the intervention had a statistically significant effect on confidentiality and disclosure-related distress in the Honest Open Proud (HOP) subgroup, but no significant influence in the non-HOP subgroup.

Assessment Synthesis Criteria
Strong Evidence
There is strong evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes.
  • At least one well-conducted systematic review or meta-analysis (including two or more large, randomized trials) showing a significant and clinically meaningful health effect; and  
  • Consistent findings of health effects from other studies (cohort, case-control, and other designs).
Sufficient Evidence
There is sufficient evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes.
  • At least one well-conducted systematic review or meta-analysis (including two or more large, randomized trials) showing a significant and clinically meaningful health effect, but inconsistent findings in other studies; or
  • Consistent findings from at least three non-randomized control trial studies (cohorts, practical trials, analysis of secondary data); or
  • A single, sufficiently large well-conducted randomized controlled trial demonstrating clinically meaningful health effect and consistent evidence from other studies; or
  • Multiple expert opinions/government agencies supporting the intervention.
More Evidence Needed or Mixed Evidence
There is insufficient evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes, however the results may indicate potential impact.
  • Lack of demonstration of improved health outcomes based on any of the following: (a) a systematic review or meta-analysis; (b) a large randomized controlled trial; (c) consistent positive results from multiple studies in high-quality journals; or (d) multiple expert opinions or government agencies supporting the intervention.
  • An insufficient evidence rating does not mean there is no evidence, or that the intervention is unsafe or ineffective.
  • In many cases, there is a need for more research or longer-term follow-up.
There is strong evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes.
There is sufficient evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes.
There is insufficient evidence that the intervention will produce the intended outcomes, however the results may indicate potential impact.
  • At least one well-conducted systematic review or meta-analysis (including two or more large, randomized trials) showing a significant and clinically meaningful health effect; and  
  • Consistent findings of health effects from other studies (cohort, case-control, and other designs).
  • At least one well-conducted systematic review or meta-analysis (including two or more large, randomized trials) showing a significant and clinically meaningful health effect, but inconsistent findings in other studies; or
  • Consistent findings from at least three non-randomized control trial studies (cohorts, practical trials, analysis of secondary data); or
  • A single, sufficiently large well-conducted randomized controlled trial demonstrating clinically meaningful health effect and consistent evidence from other studies; or
  • Multiple expert opinions/government agencies supporting the intervention.
  • Lack of demonstration of improved health outcomes based on any of the following: (a) a systematic review or meta-analysis; (b) a large randomized controlled trial; (c) consistent positive results from multiple studies in high-quality journals; or (d) multiple expert opinions or government agencies supporting the intervention.
  • An insufficient evidence rating does not mean there is no evidence, or that the intervention is unsafe or ineffective.
  • In many cases, there is a need for more research or longer-term follow-up.
Sources

[1] Huang, X., Hu, N., Yao, Z., & Peng, B. (2022). Family functioning and adolescent depression: A moderated mediation model of self-esteem and peer relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962147  

[2] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Major depression. National Institute of Mental Health. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/major-depression

[3] Wilson, S., & Dumornay, N. M. (2022). Rising Rates of Adolescent Depression in the United States: Challenges and Opportunities in the 2020s. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 70(3), 354–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.12.003

[4] Lu W. Adolescent Depression: National Trends, Risk Factors, and Healthcare Disparities. Am J Health Behav. 2019; 43(1):181-194.

[5] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Major depression. National Institute of Mental Health. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/major-depression

[6] Sim WH, Jorm AF, Yap MBH. The Role of Parent Engagement in a Web-Based Preventive Parenting Intervention for Child Mental Health in Predicting Parenting, Parent and Child Outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(4):2191.

[7] Petito, A., Pop, T. L., Namazova-Baranova, L., Mestrovic, J., Nigri, L., Vural, M., Sacco, M., Giardino, I., Ferrara, P., & Pettoello-Mantovani, M. (2020). The burden of depression in adolescents and the importance of early recognition. The Journal of Pediatrics, 218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.12.003

[8] Rinke, Michael L. MD, PhD*; Bundy, David G. MD, MPH†; Stein, Ruth E.K. MD*; O’Donnell, Heather C. MD, MS‡; Heo, Moonseong PhD§; Sangvai, Shilpa MD, MPH¶; Lilienfeld, Harris MD‖; Singh, Hardeep MD, MPH**. Increasing Recognition and Diagnosis of Adolescent Depression: Project RedDE: A Cluster Randomized Trial. Pediatric Quality and Safety 4(5):p e217, September/October 2019. | DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000217

[9] Petito, A., Pop, T. L., Namazova-Baranova, L., Mestrovic, J., Nigri, L., Vural, M., Sacco, M., Giardino, I., Ferrara, P., & Pettoello-Mantovani, M. (2020). The burden of depression in adolescents and the importance of early recognition. The Journal of Pediatrics, 218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.12.003

[10] Siu AL; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for depression in children and adolescents: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20154467.

[11] Radovic A, Moreno MA. Treatment Options for Adolescent Depression. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(3):300. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5017

[12] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Major depression. National Institute of Mental Health. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/major-depression

[13] Lu W. Adolescent Depression: National Trends, Risk Factors, and Healthcare Disparities. Am J Health Behav. 2019; 43(1):181-194.

[14] Pabayo R, Benny C, Liu SY, et al. Financial Barriers to Mental Healthcare Services and Depressive Symptoms among Residents of Washington Heights, New York City. Hisp Health Care Int. 2022; 20(3):184-194. 

[15] Jaycox L, Burnam A, Meredith L, et al. The Teen Depression Awareness Project: Building an Evidence Base for Improving Teen Depression Care. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2010. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9495.html.

[16] Stewart SM, Simmons A, Habibpour E. Treatment of culturally diverse children and adolescents with depression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2012; 22(1):72-79. 

[17] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Treating Children’s Mental Health with Therapy. 2024. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/children-mental-health/treatment/index.html. Accessed on March 19, 2025. 

[18] Kuo, D. Z., Houtrow, A. J., Arango, P., Kuhlthau, K. A., Simmons, J. M., & Neff, J. M. (2012). Family-centered care: current applications and future directions in pediatric health care. Maternal and child health journal, 16(2), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0751-7

[19] National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). NAMI Family Support Group. 2022. Available at: https://nami.org/Support-Education/Support-Groups/NAMI-Family-Support-Group. Accessed on September 19, 2022.

[20] Peer-to-peer mental health support: California school-based health alliance. California School-Based Health Alliance | Bringing Health Care to Kids in School. (2024, June 3). https://www.schoolhealthcenters.org/resources/student-impact/peer-support/

[21] Jaycox L, Burnam A, Meredith L, et al. The Teen Depression Awareness Project: Building an Evidence Base for Improving Teen Depression Care. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2010. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9495.html.

[22] Children and youth. Medicaid.gov. (n.d.). https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/benefits/behavioral-health-services/children-and-youth/index.html

[23] Conrad, L., Lee, M., & Okolo, Z. (2024, April 10). Using medicaid to address young people’s mental health needs in school settings | commonwealth fund. The Commonwealth Fund. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2024/using-medicaid-address-young-peoples-mental-health-needs-school-settings

[24] Conrad, L., Lee, M., & Okolo, Z. (2024, April 10). Using medicaid to address young people’s mental health needs in school settings | commonwealth fund. The Commonwealth Fund. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2024/using-medicaid-address-young-peoples-mental-health-needs-school-settings

[25] Frequently asked questions on Medicaid and chip ... Medicaid.gov. (2024, June 5). https://www.medicaid.gov/federal-policy-guidance/downloads/faq06052024.pdf

Contact Us!

Would you like to request additional information or support from HealthBegins?
CTA Left ImageCTA Right Image
close Popup

Get Involved and Stay Connected

Be the first to receive updates on the Social Needs Investment Lab and how to participate.